 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate agent in Kagohara Kinokuni-shoji Co., Ltd.
Top page >> Column >> Whose thing is land? |
Professor: Does this theme change just for a moment, and relax by "land is whose thing ?" with the former?
Ken: Whose thing ... Since there is ownership, if you buy it, naturally it is its thing.
Professor: If common, do think so? But in the case of land, it is a little different.
If it is called Ken:?
Professor: First of all, ask a question. Money applied when you buy chocolate at a convenience store?
Ken: Is a consumption tax attached to the price of a chocolate, and it first?
The chocolate bought with teaching: is done what?
Ken: -- そりゃあ -- Eating immediately, making it the material of cooking, keeping carefully, or raising to people たり ... is this related to the talk of land?
Professor: シャラップ! You are what should just reply to having been heard. ま -- if you buy a chocolate in short, the rest is things as he may make it like.
Yes [: / Ken ] ...
In あ土地, by teaching:, I will think in how. Money applied when you buy it?
Ken: Although しょ and a consumption tax are nothing, do they require a real estate acquisition tax and a registration license tax something at price?
Professor: Documentary stamp tax also starts besides it and an inheritance tax, a special landholding tax, a donation tax, business office tax, etc. start depending on the case.
Ken: Compared with a chocolate, it is serious, peevish, and -.
Professor: Further, if you buy a chocolate, although money will not be applied, in the case of land, apply money.
Ken: They are a fixed property tax and a city planning tax.
Professor: Just like that. This also requires other taxes depending on the case. Land requires money only by having.
Ken: Although it is its land ... [ じ and ]
teaching: -- further -- further -- だ -- although I will throw away although I will eat a chocolate, but it can do liking, land does not go so.
Ken: Can't its land be used liking?
teaching: -- 宅建 -- having studied -- ? Town Planning and Zoning Act, the National Land Use Planning Act, Agricultural Land Law, the rezoning method, and the Building Standard Law -- in addition -- various ... is it hard to say that it can use very freely?
Ken: -- such の -- it is amusing! Its thing cannot be used liking!
When it comes to teaching:, the premise is wrong primarily. Although I will sell in land, it will be bought, but he is not itself. It is a thing of a country. We only borrow the land of the country.
Ken: Bark and it is ?.
Professor: It is intelligible if it thinks like this. The person whom the country bought with the landlord is a tenant. A fixed property tax etc. is a house rent and a real estate acquisition tax etc. is a reward. ほ - et al. -- it is intelligible?
Ken: -- Although it is intelligible ... conviction is good -- it does not become precocious -
Professor: It is such もん even if there is nothing in 紊得い. However, a country is a アコギ landlord. Although it is such age, the reward is still taken.
Ken: If it says so, the latest rental will not take a reward in many cases.
Professor: It is a one-time big task as acquiring real estate for most people in a lifetime. But, a luxury tax called a real estate acquisition tax is plucked?
Ken: Has the poor man said "Live in lease throughout life"?
Professor: Severer one is a registration license tax. It is the tax made by stopgap of the cost of war of the Sino-Japanese War in this. up to [ when ] -- stopgap of the cost of war -- って -- る and つ -! However it may think, are not suitable in the present age. Generally, you have to pay a country money why declaring "This land is its thing"? It is amusing?
Ken: Since it will be taxed [ such a ] very well after all, there is a point that a motion of land becomes blunt.
Professor: Although possibly the bubble era was useful for rise-in-price control of land, it is fetters conversely さ and now. Therefore, it is since it is too big tax revenues in the industry although I want you to abolish a tax of this sort. It is rather difficult.
Ken: Was it a talk that also of a dream and hope lost somehow? ...
It is not said that it is useless to buy teaching:, even so land. since land belongs to a country after all in free, I regard if it is "it being desperate and protecting the land of ancestor each generation", saying [ if it is "fields 残して splendid to a child and wax", ] so as kana without better thinking over just for a moment -- a thing . It is better to buy land with a feeling to the extent that it says, "It is enough if only its 代 can be used." My opinion is finished above and it is !.
Ken: -- a fervent speech -- thank you. I obtained and sent - and this time by former and the theme which changed just for a moment. Moreover, it is next time to pleasure - |
|
|
