 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate agent in Kagohara Kinokuni-shoji Co., Ltd.
Top page >> Real estate guide >> Wooden, a steel frame, and which is good? |
Wooden, a steel frame, and which is good?
Let's tell about the quality of the material of the building frame of a residence.
But building frame is equivalent to the framework of a building, it is an important portion.
Unless building frame is strong, neither earthquake resistance nor durability is expectable.
Moreover, the ease of carrying out of reformation also changes with the quality of the material of building frame.
The quality of the materials of the building frame of a residence are usually a "tree" and "iron."
There are both good marks and points of being inferior.
I compare from various points this time.
■ As opposed to a fire
A tree burns easily and iron cannot burn easily.
Therefore, it seems that a tree is weak in a fire and iron is strong in a fire.
If surely "the ease of burning" was compared, the way of iron won.
However, intensity is lost rapidly [ iron ] at about 550 degrees.
If it becomes high temperature, it will become グニャ っ like 融けた飴.
If time is taken in fire extinguishing when it became and becomes a fire, there is a danger that a building will collapse at a stretch.
It is thought that a tree is weak in a fire on the contrary.
However, even if a tree is burned for fire, it requires time for burning only with the surface carbonizing completely to an inside.
Therefore, there are few cases where the whole building collapses at a stretch for a short time.
■ Temperature of the room
Although it understands by the seen touch, a wooden good mark is that there is warmth.
Conversely, a steel frame and concrete are cold.
This is related to the warmth of the whole building.
For example, in a wooden high airtight high heat insulation residence, a floor heater is not needed in many cases.
Probably, by a steel frame or concrete 造, a floor heater is needed on the contrary.
■ History of the quality of the material
As you know, the residence in Japan has been made from wood from ancient times.
There is considerable history in the knowledge of the quality of the material, or the skill of construction.
It seems that a seasonal temperature change is intense and the wooden building suited in the humid climates.
It seems that moreover, the construction of a stone or mud was impossible since it was large.
On the other hand, iron history is short. Is it about at most 100 years?
It is still new skill.
■ The ease of carrying out of reformation
A tree is easy. Conversely, iron is difficult.
Although a tree is easy to patch [ to also cut or ], iron does not go to such a reason.
■ Deviation by elasticity
Since a tree is a living thing, it expands and contracts at temperature or humidity.
Therefore, after building, the extended talk of having been shrunk is well.
Conversely, iron is not usually expanded and contracted.
Although the news that the rail of the railroad expanded were in too much heat, there is no such thing in a building.
It is as a drawing just always.
It compared in some respects.
It seems that it generally sees and wooden is popular too in Japan.
Especially the word "wooden warmth" is well heard from a visitor.
Even so, it is not necessarily said that 鉄骨造 is inferior positively.
There are many iron merits.
Although superiority or inferiority stick at each point, although which is excellent, synthetically, it does not become precocious.
A woman likes a tree on an old experience and a male tends to like iron.
Does the last become a favorite problem?
In the case of me
Since it is the age which grew up with toy "superalloy", a romance is felt for iron.
But the smell of the secret base built to the timberyard at ancient times is not forgotten, either.
obtaining -- ～ -- peevish [ ん, and ] without being decided ...
|
|
|
