"he being able to buy at a low price than a house rent" a flier -- ? ホント
The flier of a residence or real estate which enters by insertion of a newspaper during a weekend.
"He can buy it at a low price than a house rent" is often written.
If you can buy it now at a low price than the paid house rent, the way bought rather than having borrowed will be profit.
But is it しょ right [ that ] really?
The payment pattern which appears in most fliers is only the monthly payment of a loan.
If it sees this much, does it become cheaper to be sure than a house rent?
However, the other expense is not contained.
If you buy real estate, expense will start besides the price of the real estate itself.
It becomes splendid frames, such as expense for maintaining [ repairing cost / the expenses when buying real estate / insurance, a repairing cost ], and also a fixed property tax.
In the case of an apartment, administrative expenses, repair savings expense, parking lot cost, etc. start further.
"furthermore -- if the place of the monthly payment of a loan is often seen -- it is 1.5% for" 35 years -- it has written.
To be sure, 1.5% of a preferential interest rate is a talk which are two years and that short period and is acquired.
However, there is no financial institution which will lend at such interest rates by fixation for 35 years.
First of all, it has calculated at impossible interest rates.
Of course, ひっくるめて may all also be able to buy them at a low price than a house rent.
I see especially northern Saitama in which we are present from the balance of the price of a house rent and a residence, and think that it is a borderline.
There are people with "cheaper" buying it rather than borrowing very well.
Although accepting the talk of a flier or a business manager without question is not impressed, let's calculate perfectly.
If it is that with "cheaper" buying it rather than borrowing truly, since it is the best time for buying now [ of interest rates / cheap ].
|
